synthetic avatar style catalog: organize fictional characters as reusable reviewed assets
A synthetic avatar style catalog is a library of fictional visual identities. Its purpose is to give a product or learning experience a consistent illustration system, not to imply that a real person endorsed or participated in the experience. Define the fictional role and the intended uses before generating portraits.
Genace can create image candidates, but it does not guarantee character continuity across requests or provide an avatar identity registry. Catalog organization, review, cropping, storage, and application mapping belong to your own workflow.
Define characters as design records
Give each fictional character an internal identifier, role, style description, and allowed uses. Avoid using a real person’s name as the identity shortcut. Describe visible design traits and tone without presenting the result as a photograph of an actual customer or employee.
Choose a small approved reference set for the catalog. Record which characteristics are stable, such as illustration medium or framing, and which may vary, such as expression. This is a review convention rather than a promise that a seed will reproduce the same identity.
Review expressions independently
| Asset family | Review focus | Rejection example |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral portrait | Recognizable design and framing | Character differs from approved reference |
| Welcoming expression | Appropriate tone | Gesture implies an unavailable action |
| Error-state illustration | Respectful communication | Expression blames the user |
| Small icon crop | Clear silhouette | Face becomes unrecognizable |
| Group scene | Distinct identities | Characters merge or duplicate |
If you need exact continuity, plan a deterministic illustration or editing process around approved sources. Do not assume that several independent generated images will preserve every facial or clothing detail.
Export for actual interface roles
Create separate derivatives for circular icons, square cards, and larger illustrations. A circular crop can remove important hair or gesture detail, so inspect it in the component where it will appear. Keep the unmodified master available.
Decide how the character is described in the interface. A fictional guide may have a visible name or role, but a decorative portrait beside complete text may not need a redundant description. Review that decision according to the actual component context.
Keep status symbols, exact words, and action labels in controlled interface layers. An avatar should support the message rather than become the only way a user learns whether something succeeded or failed.
Maintain a catalog with provenance
Save character identifier, source outputs, accepted reference, expression, crop recipe, review, and destination mappings. If a style refresh changes the character design, create a new version and review its dependent assets.
Do not silently replace one character’s image with another because their colors are similar. Catalog identity is an application relationship that needs explicit maintenance, even when all characters are fictional.
Acceptance checklist
Compare each asset with the approved reference family, inspect expressions and anatomy, test final crops, and verify fictional presentation. Confirm that no portrait is labeled as a real customer and that every interface role has the appropriate reviewed derivative.
See empty-state illustrations, asset lineage, and image evaluation.
Continue with creative workflows
Where these facts come from
- codebase: src/app/api/v1/images/generations/route.ts
- codebase: src/ai/providers/types.ts
- Application-owned workflow recommendations; human review and post-processing are outside the generation gateway
- Editorial keyword hypothesis; search volume not measured